Skip to Content (custom)

Guide to Technologies for Preventing Serious Injuries and Fatalities Related to Last-minute Work Changes

Publication No
FR-382
Type
Printable assessment(s)
Publication Date
Sep 01, 2022
Pages
157
Research Team
RT-382
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract

Unforeseen changes in work site conditions or work operations can be stressful, but especially in last-minute situations when workers are under time constraints. In some instances, the time pressure can lead to distractions, frustration, and poor decisions. In the field, however, a poor safety decision made in response to a last-minute change can result in a serious injury or fatality.

RT-382 found that last-minute changes play a role in the majority of SIF incidents. To respond to this situation, the team explored the idea of using technologies to prevent and/or mitigate the impacts of last-minute work changes that could lead to serious injury or even fatalities.

RT-382 mapped the catalog of technologies to the functional requirements: real-time monitoring, assessing, decision-making, and taking action. The team found that most present systems lack the robust capabilities required. Only two types of technologies could perform all of the functions required to address last-minute changes – AI and site control and site access technologies – but neither is currently ready and trusted. The team concluded that the industry needs to continue its investment in technological development, especially in robotics and AI.

Key Findings

RT-382 identified 40 currently available technologies that potentially are able to help mitigate last-minute changes to prevent SIFs. The technologies have a variety of capabilities and applications, and are at various stages of readiness for implementation (FR-382, p. 11).

The team organized these technologies into seven categories:

  1. Communications and Mobile Computing
  2. Sensing
  3. Visualization
  4. Monitoring
  5. Automation
  6. Site Control and Site Access
  7. Artificial Intelligence

Figure 1. Detail from the Technology Catalog

By reviewing 179 cases reported in the NIOSH Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation (FACE) Program, RT-382 exposed the connection between last-minute changes and SIFs. When a change was a factor in the fatality incident, approximately 71% of the changes could be classified as last-minute changes. For all the FACE cases reviewed, gravity and motion were the predominant types of energy that led to the fatality incident (FR-382, p. 26):

RT-382’s analysis of NIOSH FACE cases revealed that the most common types of last-minute changes associated with SIF incidents were related to equipment usage, the work process, and worker/equipment path. These results suggest that two types of technologies could have a significantly positive impact on preventing SIFs (FR-382, p. 28):

  • Technologies that detect and mitigate hazardous last-minute changes in human-equipment proximity.
  • Technologies that detect and mitigate last-minute changes in the planned work process.

RT-382’s in-depth study of technology capabilities and the skills and competencies required in the face of last-minute changes enabled the team to map the technologies to the cognitive process that workers must take when a last-minute change occurs. The process included the following steps:

  • Monitoring the work process and conditions
  • Identifying that a change has occurred and comprehending what it was
  • Determining options for responding to the change
  • Selecting the best option
  • Deciding to implement that option
  • Implementing the selected option.

The team’s analysis revealed the limitations of current technologies in fulfilling all of these skills and competencies (FR-382, p. 55).

Table 1. Ability of Technologies to Perform Situational Awareness Requirements for Mitigating Last-minute Changes

Technology adoption protocols help an organization decide whether to adopt a technology. After using an extensive literature review and the Delphi technique to gain consensus, RT-382 developed a process to aid the decision whether to adopt a technology for mitigating last-minute changes, along with guiding which of the adoption factors to consider (FR-382, p. 50). The process involves three steps:

  1. A high-level preliminary assessment
  2. A detailed assessment of organizational, individual, external, technology, and vendor implications
  3. A field assessment to certify the technology’s positive impact on last-minute changes
Filters & Tags
Project Phase
Research Topic
Technologies to Prevent Serious Injuries and Fatalities Related to Last-minute Work Changes
Keywords
safety, technology, technology adoption, last-minute change, serious injury and fatality, SIF, rt382