Skip to Content (custom)
PDRI for Manufacturing & Life Sciences

PDRIx: Project Definition Rating Index -- Manufacturing & Life Sciences

Publication No
FR-MLS-02
Type
Excel spreadsheet
Publication Date
Oct 01, 2018
Pages
99
Research Team
RT-MLS-02
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract

PDRIx for Manufacturing and Life Sciences (MLS) Projects is a scope definition tool developed specifically for the MLS sector to help project teams measure the degree of scope definition, identify gaps, and take appropriate actions to reduce risk during front end planning. PDRIx for MLS Projects is a derivative of PDRI–Industrial that follows the same recommended practices for conducting PDRI assessments. Research Team MLS-02 (RT-MLS-02) updated the earlier PDRI element list to address the critical scope definition needs of capital projects with the following features:

  • Involve manufacturing of products within a facility.
  • Include both process- and building-related design elements.
  • Follow a rigorous commissioning and qualification process in a highly regulated environment (e.g., FDA, EPA, OSHA).
  • Make extensive use of enterprise and control systems for business and process automation.
  • Adhere to strict environmental controls.

This report provides an overview of RT-MLS-02’s research and development of PDRIx for MLS Projects. The research team identified several new elements to address critical scope definition needs of the MLS sector. It also made element updates and additions to address technological, design, and project management innovations that have become industry standards since PDRI–Industrial was first published in 1995.

Overall, PDRIx for MLS Projects includes 83 elements, compared to 70 in PDRI–Industrial. The additional elements in this PDRIx are primarily located in two new categories under Section II – Basis of Design:

  • Category H. Building Programming & Design Parameters
  • Category K. Enterprise & Control Systems

The research team conducted weighting workshops to assess the relative importance of each element in terms of its potential risk to successful project delivery. These workshops attracted 30 industry professionals (26 with previous PDRI experience) from 18 different organizations within the MLS sector. This undertaking represented the first time in more than 20 years that the relative weighting of elements derived from PDRI–Industrial has been revisited, and the results showed a substantial shift in element weighting. Specifically, the most highly weighted elements in PDRIx for MLS Projects included the project cost estimate (a new element), project objectives and strategy, and specifications for the products to be manufactured or the services to be offered.

The PDRI methodology has helped project teams to improve scope definition and alignment, and it has provided greater transparency by identifying gaps. These benefits help equip all project stakeholders to respond better to risks identified in PDRI reviews, to predict potential issues, and to improve cost and schedule performance. PDRIx for MLS Projects aligns with this proven methodology, as well as CII’s recommended practices for implementing PDRI. Previous CII research shows that industrial projects with a PDRI score under 200 (better-defined scope) consistently outperform projects with a PDRI score above 200 in terms of cost, schedule, and change orders (CII 2013).

Preliminary validation testing results from completed and in-progress projects which RT-MLS-02 examined indicate that organizations should achieve improvements in project performance similar to those realized using PDRI–Industrial; however, the PDRIx for MLS Projects’ updated element weightings should help project teams more accurately identify which elements pose the greatest risk to successful project delivery. Overall, an analysis of 42 projects, representing more than $5.06 billion in total installed cost shows that PDRIx for MLS Projects gives project teams in the MLS sector an effective assessment tool to understand risk and help identify gaps in scope definition. (See Appendix D for details on the test projects.)

Key Findings

PDRIx for MLS includes updated element descriptions and new elements to more specifically meet the needs of MLS facilities and to align with the most recent CII research publications and best practices.

Category N. Project Controls has been revised to align with the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International (AACEI) standards for project cost estimate classifications, cost control, and schedule control. A detailed list of element changes is provided in Appendix C of the final report.


Building Programming & Design Parameters

Many capital projects in the MLS sector are a mix of both industrial and building scope. Category H. Building Programming & Design Parameters has been added to assist projects in assessing building-related scope items.


Enterprise & Control Systems

Automation has become an integral part of many capital projects in the MLS sector. Category K. Enterprise & Control Systems has been added to assist project teams in conducting a thorough assessment of automated interfaces between enterprise and control systems. This category aligns with ANSI/ISA 95.01-2000 Enterprise – Control System Integration – Part 1: Models and Terminology.”

New elements include:

  • K.1 Measurement & Final Control Devices
  • K.2 Monitoring & Control Systems
  • K.3 Manufacturing Operations Systems
  • K.4 Business Planning & Logistics System


Project Execution Plan

Significant changes were made to the following elements in Category P. Project Execution Plan to reflect the needs of the MLS sector:

  • P.2 Owner Approval Requirements
  • P.3 Engineering & Construction Plan
  • P.5 Commissioning/Qualification/Validation Plan
  • P.6 Startup & Turnover Requirements

PDRIx for MLS has the same format as the other PDRI tools. Organizations are encouraged to continue to follow CII recommended practices for PDRI implementation including:

  • Use a PDRI facilitator that is independent of the project team.
  • Apply PDRI during front end planning (PDRI 1, 2, 2i, and 3).
  • Use the same definition levels when assessing elements.
  • Score elements as "not applicable" when they are not applicable to the project.
  • Normalize.
  • Employ the same recommended score ranges for PDRI 1, 2, 2i, and 3.
  • Interpret PDRI scores the same way as you would the other templates.

In PDRIx for MLS, Section III – Execution Approach carries a significantly higher weight (223) compared to the parallel section in PDRI–Industrial (78), but it is in line with PDRI templates published since 2011. PDRI weighting workshops conducted since 2011 indicate the increased importance of a well-defined execution approach to achieving successful project outcomes.

Filters & Tags