Skip to Content (custom)

Critical Success Factors for Project Commissioning and Startup

Publication No
RS312-1
Type
Research & Development Product
Publication Date
Sep 01, 2015
Pages
33
Research Team
RT-312
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract

Commissioning and startup (CSU) is the critical last phase of a capital project before the facility is placed in operation to meet commercial objectives. Unfortunately, many project teams do not effectively plan and implement the activities needed to ensure a successful CSU phase. Recognizing this significant shortcoming, the Construction Industry Institute (CII) chartered Research Team (RT) 312, Best Practices for Commissioning and Startup, to conduct a broad-reaching, data-centric study to determine critical activities for CSU success. After soliciting input from professional experts and collecting and analyzing objective data, the research team first identified 139 potential factors affecting CSU. Next, the team refined this list of potential factors down to 16 critical success factors (CSFs), characterizing them by their specific required actions and positions within the project phase sequence, and firmly demonstrating the need for generally earlier planning of CSU.

The research team also developed a set of unique indicators of CSF achievement to serve as “tell-tales” of whether CSFs have been implemented effectively. Utilizing these tell-tales, the team collected real project CSF implementation data and CSU performance data from 26 capital projects. The analysis of this data convincingly validated the principles and recommended timing of the CSFs. The team conducted additional analysis to determine why certain CSFs are less frequently implemented, and found that project teams should apply particular effort on these “laggard” CSFs.

The research team also showed how the CSFs complement, or can be integrated with, the steps of the CII Planning for Startup best practice model (described in CII Implementation Resource (IR) 121-2). In addition, the team identified five technologies that add value to the efforts of CSU teams and project stakeholders. The final RT 312 product was the user-friendly CSU Critical Success Factor Implementation Checklist, a tool for developing project execution and CSU plans, and for managing CSU efforts all the way through to project completion. The checklist is part of IR 312-2, Achieving Success in the Commissioning and Startup of Capital Projects, a two-volume publication offering implementation guidance and case study summaries.

Commissioning and startup success largely determines whether a project is ultimately successful. Thus, the value proposition for rigorous, thorough CSU planning cannot be overstated. Use of the 16 critical success factors identified in this research, along with other research team findings, will help project teams ensure the achievement of full project value.

Key Findings

The research identified 16 CSFs for commissioning and startup focused at a high level on: (RS312-1)

  • Leadership
  • Team Alignment
  • Integration
  • Collaboration
  • Capability
  • Success criteria
  • Interface management
  • Recognition of value drivers
  • Planning
  • Funding for planning
  • CSU systems-focus
  • Support tools
  • Information

{^widget|(widget_displayname)WatermarkImage|(name)WatermarkImage|(image)%7e%2fCII%2fmedia%2fPublications%2f312_1Table2-1.PNG%3fext%3d.png|(width)|(height)^}
{^widget|(widget_displayname)WatermarkImage|(name)WatermarkImage|(image)%7e%2fCII%2fmedia%2fPublications%2f312_1Table2-2.PNG%3fext%3d.png|(width)|(height)^}
{^widget|(widget_displayname)WatermarkImage|(name)WatermarkImage|(image)%7e%2fCII%2fmedia%2fPublications%2f312_1Table2-3.PNG%3fext%3d.png|(width)|(height)^}
{^widget|(widget_displayname)WatermarkImage|(name)WatermarkImage|(image)%7e%2fCII%2fmedia%2fPublications%2f312_1Table2-4.PNG%3fext%3d.png|(width)|(height)^}
Timing of CSF Implementation is key to the effectiveness of each CSF. Project teams should not delay their implementation of the CSF. (RS312-1, p. 13)

Management should focus on implementing and assessing CSF achievement. The research identified 45 indicators across the 16 CSFs, which could provide evidence of CSF achievement. (RS312-1, p. 16)

The research identified linkages between the 16 CSU CSFs and the Planning for Startup activity flowcharts from IR121-2, and for compatibility and congruity between two industry best practices between IR121-2 and IR312-2 (Volume I). (RS312-1, p. 21)
The most significant barriers to CSF achievement are identified to make practitioners aware so they can be confronted and mitigated at the earliest opportunity. (RS312-1, p. 25)
This research identified and characterized five innovative commissioning technologies with the following information: Objective, Benefit to CSU, and Timing. ICT enable commissioning and startup information management to leverage the capacity of CSU teams to improve CSU performance significantly. (RS312-1, p. 21)
Filters & Tags
Best Practice
Research Topic
Best Practices for Commissioning and Startup
Keywords
Commissioning, Startup, Commissioning and Startup (CSU), Work process model, Operational performance, Critical Success Factors, Indicators of achievement, Checklist tool, Innovative technologies, Project commissioning performance, Barriers to implementation, rt312