Skip to Content (custom)

Sustainable Design and Construction in Industrial Construction

Publication No
RS250-1
Type
Research & Development Product
Publication Date
Dec 01, 2008
Pages
29
Research Team
RT-250
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract

The increasing importance of sustainability is making it imperative for organizations in the industrial sector to include environmental and social considerations in the construction of capital projects. These considerations include increases in societal awareness, carbon footprints, and potential cost increases; productivity savings in construction and in operations and maintenance; increasing governmental regulations and incentives; corporate reputation; and business advantage in a competitive market. Uncertainty in the economic return of embracing sustainability will require new methods of quantifying the added value of sustainability implementation. These factors will require those in the industrial sector to increase their efforts towards sustainability on both a corporate and project level.

Some are currently addressing these issues through corporate sustainability programs, the use of a variety of existing tools and metrics, and project-level sustainable design and construction methods. Regarding a comprehensive sustainability metric for industrial construction, none currently exist for industrial construction; thus, more research is necessary to fully address this challenging topic.

This research summary includes a review of the research by the CII Sustainable Design and Construction in Industrial Construction Research Team (RT 250), including definitions of sustainability, governmental and corporate trends, corporate-level efforts, benefits and barriers, and recommended paths forward for the industry regarding sustainability.

RT 250 produced three other publications in addition to this research summary. Readers are encouraged to obtain Sustainable Design and Construction for Industrial Construction: A Primer (IR 250-2). Implementation tools developed by the team, including a checklist, a quick start guide, a maturity model, and a proposed metric can be found in IR 250-3. The team’s research report (RR 250-11) is an in-depth reference on the research performed.

Key Findings
Triple Bottom Line is a phrase coined by industry that emphasizes the need for stakeholders and businesses to include environmental and social performance as well as financial performance to examine their sustainability activities. (RS250-1, p. 4)
{^widget|(widget_displayname)WatermarkImage|(name)WatermarkImage|(image)%7e%2fCII%2fmedia%2fPublications%2f250_1Figure1.PNG%3fext%3d.png|(width)|(height)^}

The many drivers of sustainability can be categorized into 3 major trends: regulatory trends, societal trends, and business trends. These trends include the following: (RS250-1, p. 7)

  • Government Laws/Regulations
  • Sustainability Performance Measured, Assessed, Ranked, and Reported
  • Competitor Sustainability Initiatives
  • Huge Business Opportunities
  • Impacts Brand and Reputation
  • Supply Chain Accountability
  • License to Conduct Business
  • Responsible Leadership

The research identified barriers in the industry that prevent sustainability concepts from being fully embraced on industrial projects. These barriers include the following list as the most relevant to CII members. (RS250-1, p. 7)

  • Capital cost concerns
  • Competitiveness
  • Need positive ROR
  • Unsure how to do/measure
  • No implementation plan
  • Unsure profitability
  • Not required by regulations

This checklist identifies practical sustainable strategies for the contractor to implement on a project site to guide the contractor toward sustainability on the construction process. The checklist is shown below, including the potential credits for each category. Descriptions of these potential credits by category can be found in research. 

  • Site Staging and Logistics – 29 potential credits
  • Site Waste Management Plan – 7 potential credits
  • Post Construction Site Restoration – 4 potential credits
  • Site Dust and Particulate Control – 3 potential credits
  • Transportation Planning or Using Mass Transit Facilities – 2 potential credits
  • Water Management – 3 potential credits
  • Energy and Atmosphere – 8 potential credits
  • Materials and Resources – 13 potential credits
  • Investigate Alternatives for Material Deliveries – I potential credit
  • Waste Management – 5 potential credits
  • Lean Construction – 3 potential credits
  • Indoor Environmental Control – 2 potential credits
  • Social Impacts – 6 potential credits
The ISIM seeks to quantify the triple bottom line, the social, economic, and environmental impact of the project through out the supply chain. The ISIM measures the total procurement sustainability via the aggregation of vendors and product Sustainability Index (SI) scores. These ISIM scores are based on the social, economic, and environmental impact throughout the life cycle of the product: manufacturing and fabrication, assembly, shipping, installation, operation and maintenance, and ultimately, demolition and reuse. The ISIM tool is based on the supposition that the impacts along the supply chain are cumulative, and that each vendor company in that process has the ability to have an impact on other companies along the supply chain. Detail use of this metric is explained in the research materials. Note: The ISIM is still in the development stage at the completion of the work of Research Team 250.
Filters & Tags
Research Topic
Sustainable Design & Construction
Keywords
Triple Bottom Line, Industrial Sustainability, Sustainable Construction, Maturity Model, Cradle-to-Cradle, Sustainable Design, Industrial Sustainability Index Metric, Sustainability, rt250