Skip to Content (custom)

A Methodology for Identifying Automation Opportunities in Industrial Construction

Publication No
SD-56
Type
Academic Document
Publication Date
Sep 01, 1990
Pages
171
Research Team
RT-016
DOCUMENT DETAILS
Abstract
Key Findings
Filters & Tags
Abstract

Basic methods for physically putting work in place have not changed dramatically in the last 30 years. The availability of a large supply of trained construction workers has traditionally been assumed when planning projects. That availability, combined with an emphasis on short term efficiency, low costs, and a lack of research and development (R&D), has precluded significant attention to automation. As in other industries, productivity and quality in construction have been dependent more upon humans than on machines. 

The purpose of this publication is two-fold. First, it describes a methodology for identifying automation benefits. The methodology can be applied to a variety of construction activities. Second, the methodology is applied to three important areas of industrial construction: piping, electrical, and steel erection. The methodology and pilot efforts have identified a total of 12 tasks that promise to benefit from automation.

This research has addressed neither the issue of automation feasibility nor how widely a solution to a particular need might apply across the universe of construction tasks. These issues are left for future R&D activities, as is the matter of opportunities in other construction market segments.

Key Findings
One conclusion reached from the field research is that many of the construction workers are flexible and creative in the performance of their duties. This is understandable considering the obstacles that are typically encountered on any construction site: lack of proper materials and equipment, rework, and field-run construction. While perhaps distrustful of the concept of automation in their work environment, they were receptive to anything that would actually help them perform their workload. (SD-56, p. i)
The tasks which were determined by this research to be the most in need of and/or receptive to automation are listed and defined in Source Document 56. Beneath each listing of the individually top ranking tasks are task groups which are termed Cycles. These cycles are related by sequence and therefore considered to be candidates for the most efficient automation technology. In general, the types of tasks that are most common to all three areas are lifting, aligning, and connecting. Whether engaged in fabrication or erection activities, above grade or at grade, these three types of tasks represent a majority of worker time. (SD-56, p. ii)
Filters & Tags
Research Topic
Advanced Technological Systems
Keywords
Automation Feasibility, Cost-Concern Matrix, Needs Assessment Process, Individual Tasks, Advanced Construction Technology System, graphical simulation in construction, automated construction devices, rt16